
Recently, we met with a new client. As we discussed various housing options, she mentioned a home that she had found online and fallen in love with. She couldn't remember the website, but was sure that it was one of the websites advertised on TV. We started listing off sites we knew, hoping to jolt her memory. Finally we googled a term close to what she thought the website was named
Imagine our surprise when she clicked a site on google and said, "Yes, this is it!" It was the website for our LOCAL REAL ESTATE BOARD; they don't advertise on TV. But, she did not associate the site with Realtors®. It was simply a site where she went to look for listings and had found a home that she loved!
Well, this is good news and bad news for agents and more importantly for their MLS systems. The good news was she was on a Realtor site®. The bad news...well, that's obvious. While our buyer may be an anomaly, it is a jarring indication that real estate agents and the sites they frequent will not necessarily be connected in the minds of tommorow's consumers when it comes to the buying or selling of real estate.
It would be a mistake for us to ignore the fact that in the minds of a significant number of folks...homes can be found just about any place. In fact, when she indicated that she had located the site...we turned to each other and said..."Well, that's us!" What was left unsaid was..."Wow, that's obviously not important to her!"

Tonight, I picked up a Business Week article entitled "Ambush in Beijing." Amid all the clamour surrounding the Olympic torch and the outcry for Tibetan independence, stories like this get buried in the mix. This tale was not about a political ambush, but rather an economic one.
In what could easily be termed the Marketing Mecca of the Millennium, the Olympics in China represent an unprecedented opportunity to reach billions of people. That's why corporate sponsors like Coca-Cola, McDonald's and Samsung have not hesitated to fork out as much as 100 million each to be official global sponsors of the Beijing Olympic Games.
It's also why...according to Business Week, dozens of other companies with less rigidly formal ties have opted to create another kind of campaign. Instead of linking to the official games, these corporations have created lucrative financial agreements with Olympic athletes...the reason why the games exist in the first place. These measures are gaining traction. That is...many people are presuming that they are official sponsors and are more favorably disposed to doing business with them. It's Ambush Marketing at its' best!
I am struck by an uncanny comparison to the real estate marketplace today. While Beijing organizers have taken action against many Chinese corporations for illegal use of official logos, they have been unable to effectively reign in image associations which the athletes themselves allow.
It's not unlike the current state of affairs in which MLS systems fought for years to prevent listing information from being disseminated then found themselves outwitted by Ambush marketers like Zillow or Trulia who skillfully changed the very nature of the real estate conversation.
These companies have taken their incentives directly to the buying and selling public and presented an attractive service proposition to encourage listing and buying homes with their aid. The listing which was the fulcrum of the transaction when secured by the listing agent became a pendulum to be swung towards the most attractive information aggregator. The official sponsor, the MLS, found itself competing with sites that offered incredibly rich data gathering/sharing experiences garnered in significant measure from the listing data it created.

What agents and their MLS systems failed to understand was that the official endorsement of an MLS listing was only as valuable as the perception that this was the best method for buying or selling a home. When information was withheld, that was not difficult to argue. But today, with the wide dispersion of data, the waters are much murkier.
Most real estate consumers simply want the best possible real estate transaction "experience," something which the data centric model utilised by most agents has struggled to deliver. Like, my client, real estate consumers are more concerned about who delivers the "total package. They are less deeply vested in who owns the website where they find the listing because information is ubiquitous. A relevant, informative and interactive real estate experience is not!
This situation will continue to evolve and expand in the years ahead. The vital links in this system are the buyer and seller. The new systems for delivery will rise or fall on the basis of their ability to win the market share of each big or little piece of turf called home in a way which draws participants into engagement and thereby association.
Make no mistake about it, the hottest piece of real estate right now is not ocean front property or an expensive New York highrise condominium. Rather, it roams around daily taking in the sights and sounds of it's environment and microprocessing them into a zillion different opinions about what will influence the buying or selling decision. It is nuanced and fickle, opinionated and easily swayed. The hottest piece of real estate on the planet is mind share...it's physical address... the space between your two ears.
pictures courtesy of pdphoto.org
Copyright 2008 Audu Real Estate All Rights Reserved

Lola Audu, is the Designated Broker & Owner of Audu Real Estate. Our company specializes in helping people buy and sell homes in the greater Grand Rapids, West Michigan area. We've had the privilege of helping hundreds of clients succeed in their goals of purchasing and selling property including demonstrated success in the negotiation of Short Sale Transactions. You can contact us via e-mail @ info@auduhomes.com or by phone at 616-791-0511.

Lola,
Great points. I give my clients our MLS address and they still go to Realtor.com, etc. I explain that our MLS is real time and the same info that I use just not the particulars for the REALSTORS but still they don't get it - we are www.lynchburgmls.com and it is our Lynchburg Association of REALTORS web site. I think it's so funny because the other web sites are not up to date and of course ours is real time. The clients want to prove that they know more than we do - frustrating because they are looking at their one type of property not at everything - so they love to one up us. I love it when I have to search by price and county because that's all they can remember or even use a picture - so how many McMansions can you tell apart?
Oh well all part of the game - and if it was easy everyone would do it!!!
Kathy
I had one of these "wow" moments yesterday. I ran into a client who I had closed two weeks ago. I asked her how the move was, if she was able to find her way around, anything I could help with. She says she does have a question. Since I am affiliated with, insert large franchise name here, can I help them find out why a real estate deal on land they have in the Bahamas is held up. As that agent is with "big franchise". I tell her I am not associated with big franchise and she tells me, "But I found you on their web site."
With so many different sites out there, seems like there is a new one every day anymore, it's hard to determine how the consumer gets to you.
Lola,
This change is going to affect the way agents work. I tried to bring it up before, not succeeded though.
Many agents are trying to weather the slow market, and expect to come back to 2004-2005 market, it is very unlikely that it is going to happen this way. Agent may find themselves not as needed as before.
It is a major shift, and we are not ready for it. We may be talking about the value of the Realtor, but as you note, what is important is how the customers see it. With all the values, Realtors may end up preaching in the desert.
What is really a funny (odd) development is that consumers believe they have so much information that can be easily found, and yet it may not be that credible. Another reason that working with a knowledgeable agent is beneficial in winnowing out the chaff (the misinformation) and zeroing in on real data for their clients.
Agents may end up becoming not the gatekeepers of information, but the traffic cops for directing information and stopping misinformation!
Lola,
You are so right. it is great the consumers can find us via the web and our local MLS's. They don't seem to remember how they got there.
Lola,
I think you're "right on" with this article. Good information.
Lola,
Great article. I beleive that the easier it is for the consumer to get information, the more value a buyers rep will have. Buyers will need help buying a house not finding one.
It is inevitable that it will only get easier to find information on the Internet. In addition, as the non-Internet people phase out of this world, they will be replaced with Internet-savy people. This will ensure that the current trend continues.
Buyers will still need a buyers agent, an attorney, a mortgage, etc...But, there may be less use for a listing agent. This is probably why they are already dismissing the source.
Lola, yesterday we had our quarterly office meeting. During it the topic of "One system - one point of entry" came up. In a nutshell we are all trying to find ways for our collective multilist systems and boards to play in the sandbox nicely together and share information freely with one point of entry.
Why? Because the consumers are clearly finding information on their own, searching on their own and being successful at it.
Awesome article.
This is a great article, Lola, but I'm not sure I get what you mean.
Surely the point is not how they find you but the value they get when there. Isn't it true to say that the bulk of a realtor's business is from referrals? Aren't you a relationship business? Why, then, does it matter about all these sites with information on them? I would have thought that was a good thing - it gets a property publicized in the widest way possible thereby finding a buyer faster than the old method. Better that than the buyer stumbling around with a dozy realtor who doesn't understand the difference between what buyer says they want and what they really need... who doesn't show you listing becuase he or she doesn't get it?
A realtor's value picks up after the home has been seen. Is just getting buyers to a home the best use of a realtors expertise? In this regards, proliferating information sites that showcase homes would be a good thing, surely?
I want my realtor to negotiate for me, to keep the deal together, to keep track of the myriad of details and get the deal done. I'd love it if they knew the whole story on a home I'm looking at, but few will tell you even if they do. I'd love it if they were able to read my dreams and translate what I'm seeing in my mind's eye into an option on the ground. They're not mindreaders, I acknowledge, and that's a tall order... but I'm terrified of confiding in a realtor for fear they'll use my words to close me on an option my heart isn't connnected to.
But what do I know? I'm just an investor, stager and homeowner, who has bought and lived in 14 houses in my lifetime thus far...and long forgotten all the rentals in Manhattan!
Lola,
I'm certainly far from an expert on internet marketing but I have found one truth to be true. The consumers trolling the net in my market simply don't care who owns the site or what brand name is affiliated with the site. They want information and they want it now--not ten minutes from now and not two phone calls from now. The sites with the best data provided in a clean easy to use format will win the day.
I have three clients today from a simple site I created and they all loved using because it provided them with everything they wanted the instant they wanted it.
Tim
Congratulations on the feature, Lola. Well deserved. I have increasingly found that consumers are finding homes all over the place but don't necessairily reall where, whose site it is, where the information comes from, etc. Nor do they really seem to care, as long as they find what they need. Makessense to me.
Many don't have any loyalty to any one site but are using multiple ones. Now that may be because the sites do not all have the same information, which raises questions about the usefulness. It does make one think about how to best advise folks intheri searching, as well as to ensure they can get what they want from our sites.
Jeff
Seriously, source is inconsequential. As long as they get what they want. I think the shift is coming though. People will make purchases based on more than simple aesthetic, price and "keeping up with the Jones'". It has to change - the planet won't be able to tolerate anything less.
Thank you for this blog - it was a good one!
Lola...
Mind Share? Should I be concerned? :)
Sounds a bit like Time Share and not to mention the fact you are making up phrases.
I am so totally impressed :)
P.S. Got your e and I agree :)
TLW...ROAR!
I stopped asking buyer callers which site they saw the listing on because they almost always said Realtor.com.
I have no presence on Realtor.com. They ran into one of my web sites and found my IDX site.
The public do not understand how these things work.
I don't want to say the money makes the world goes around, but the longer I am in business world, the more I am finding it's true, at least on a corporate level. The players are becoming money commodity and products for corporations to push products. I have been playing around with facebook lately, and I am finding it's the same thing. The new "Page" feature is really another way, or even the Apps, are ways for advertisers to push more products in a more subtle way.
I recently set up a Page myself: http://tinyurl.com/3jryvf. (Figure I should push mine as well :D ) and I am interested in finding out how viral this can be for small businesses vs. big corporation names where they have the viral audience in place already on FB.
Cheers,
Cindy
The consumer today is super intelligent, more informed, enlightened, and willing to search for the information they need to make their decisions. If industry people would approach their customers this way that might increase their attraction of these new consumers(buyers & sellers)
Keenan
Great post! A lot to digest in there.
1st Part- This is why I strongly believe that you should have your listings on as many websties as you think it makes sense to be on. Consumers look at a minimum of 5 different sites when searching online and the chances that they remember the exact site that made them take action is slim. We all know that repetition in advertising works and this applies online too. Sometimes it isn't about a specific site working, it is about the consumer seeing your listing over and over no matter what site they are on, and eventually one of them will make them click.
2nd Part- Many Zillow needs to start sending tshirts and hats out to Realtors that say "sponsored by Zillow". Wait, that is what your broker does... guess that is out. It is amazing how much money is spent to promote a 75 cent can of pop. You have to sell a lot of pop to re coop that campaign!
3rd Part- Couldn't agree more that listing information is ubiquitous. From an online perspective, this means sites have to build a business model or a consumer magnet off of something more than listing information (enter blogs or zestimates). From a human perspective, you are exactly right that you need to use what's between your ears to differentiate yourself. This is what will make you memorable and will deliver 'the total package'.
Another great post!
Hi Lola...Great presentation written to be comprehended and right on target. Well worth the gold star!
Bravo!
Kathleen
I have looked at your site and will be linking to you from Alanson, Grand Rapids, Grandville, Hastings, Holland, Hudsonville, Shelbyville, Wyoming, MI. (And I have made a list of all the others who posted here and will review their sites for inclusion.) I have been building REindex.com, The Site Engine for 8 years. My goal is to address the issues you write about.
Happy Listing and Selling!