Courtesy of a link on gigaom I read a fascinating article today by People Aggregators creator Marc Canter who runs a social networking company called Broadband Mechanics. This particular article is answering a question posed by a Paul Montgomery, a gentleman in Tanzania regarding why Open ID should be adopted by blogging networks.
The discussion addresses the implications of moving beyond transparency in communication to a more intimate involvement by users of blogging platforms. This would be facilitated by a site's clients utilizing source coding behind the scenes to control access and movement of their individual content.
Yes, it's very technical, cutting edge stuff about interconnected social networks. In a nutshell the thrust is to enable networking platforms which will allow users to integrate ALL their Web 2.0 activities through one or more sites. If you're interested in understanding where this whole Web 2.0 wheel is trending towards next, it is well worth reading.
However, I found the issues with reference to ownership of content and subsequent monetization particularly interesting in light of recent events on Active Rain. Marc Canters' take on ownership of a database (of names) when it comes to a Web 2.0 portal is that you don't...indeed can't. In fact he seems to dismiss the issue as ultimately irrelevant in the larger scheme of things.
"But dude - look. NO ONE is gonna wanna hang out in YOUR network. Its as simple as that. Trust humans - they migrate to where they're wanted, to where they're welcome, to where they feel comfortable. So if someone finds your network comfortable - then it's the right place for them - right? How do you determine who's welcome or not in your network? Their proximity to Tanzania? Golfing? Chocolate lover? Gay? Hispanic? By what criteria do you welcome people into your network?"
The issue is not about owning bloggers or owning their content as Canter rightly points out. Click Here to Continue Reading what the real issues are...
Copyright 2007 Audu Real Estate All Rights Reserved
Click Here to Read More about Grand Rapids, Michigan

Lola Audu, is the Designated Broker & Owner of Audu Real Estate. Our company specializes in helping people buy and sell homes in the greater Grand Rapids, West Michigan area. We've had the privilege of helping hundreds of clients succeed in their goals of purchasing and selling property including demonstrated success in the negotiation of Short Sale Transactions. You can contact us via e-mail @ info@auduhomes.com or by phone at 616-791-0511.

Oh Lola. You did it again. I hadn't planned on doing any thinking today.
I must first state that I will never be a part of any "social network" that will have me as a member. In fact, it is unlikely that I'll ever be a part of any "social network". I'm quite happy to be a member of the Active Rain Real Estate Network.
The Internet has empowered the average Joe to go to his computer, build a network, launch it, have folks join and right away he thinks he owns a network of people. He doesn't. He owns nothing more than the right to use his domain for the time he pays for it. He also owns the copyright to any content he created himself. The domain control may have some value. The content not created by the owner has little to no value.
It's the synergy on the Internet that has value. If a person can create a presence on the Internet that attracts sufficient number of page views to entice an advertiser to pay money/rent, he owns something for which folks will pay rent. He's got retail space for rent on 5th Avenue or #2 Google SERP. If his retail space is in a warehouse district 10 miles out of town, he's got nothing, like being found on page 8000 of Google.
Folks are cluttering up the Internet with social networks every day and they have no monetary value whatsoever. Even with Google AdSense, they haven't sufficient traffic to pay light bill for their computer. They have nothing unique.
I didn't see the matter with Move.com as anything more than a 800 lb Gorilla throwing his weight around. The perfidy of Move.com was palpable. However, they have not the enterprising spirit that makes ActiveRain successful. Move.com wanted to own us. ActiveRain serves us. That is the difference. Move.com thinks that the value of ActiveRain is in the list of members. They got worthless lists.
ActiveRain is succeeding because the owners are focused on offering a platform for the members to benefit. They are also technically proficient. We are all just along for the ride.
Lenn, Getting you "to think" is one of the best compliments a blogger can get. :) Appreciate as always your insightful comment. I would respectfully disagree with your first point that Active Rain is not a social network. While it does focus on real estate as the basic premises for its existence, the social aspects of the network are as important if not more important than the real estate informational aspects.
I am certain that the social element has been extremely influential in the growth of the network. Many people, myself included, blog on Activerain because we like most of the people and have respect for the founders.
I would agree that Move.com did not get it. Or perhaps at the last waning moments they did get it. A network of this nature cannot be owned because you have access to names and information. There's no Value inherent in names...except perhaps the value of annoying people by intruding on them with unwanted inquiries or advertisement. The Value is in Owning their Loyalty. Loyalty is not necessarily transferable and when it is conveyed must be handled with kid gloves to make sure it survives the journey.
The new currency of Value for social networks regardless of how they position themselves professionally will be the Loyalty of their customer base and the benefits their clients perceive they are receiving. In the case of Active Rain, the SEO positioning and the knowledge shared by its writers is potent power. It's simply key to appreciate that both these elements have little connection with the 60,000+ members most of whom never participate.
Lola- this is interesting.....and I know many people stay on AR because of the people, and some of the other networks are fun at first....just too many of them for me. Loyalty...isn't this the basis of everything?
Lola, OK Let's see if I got this right: you want to be able to "login" to a list of social networks with one login. You don't want rules, you want everything for free, and the owners should be grateful that we condescended to use their platform? Is that it? I still don't get it.
Personally, I think AR is too good to be true. I've been here six months and I still see how they can provide what they do for free. There has got to be a payday somewhere.
And I don't have time for a bunch of these places. AR is all I can handle.
Bill Roberts
Kathy, Loyalty is Huge! It's just measured differently on line. Think about the average visit to most websites...seconds. But, through RSS FEED, people download other people's thoughts and insights as soon as they're published.
Here on Active Rain thousands of people put up profiles and a few blogs and never do anything. But they don't remove their content either. In a sense, Loyalty has some very different connotations in the world of cyberspace than it does in real life.